- The Big Shift
- Posts
- Your AI Is Getting Dumber Every Day
Your AI Is Getting Dumber Every Day
Here’s why traditional AI onboarding is setting you up to fail - and what we learned by flipping the model inside out.
60 companies onboarded. 5 days. 22-minute average setup.
We didn't just streamline AI implementation. We proved you can deliver premium, personalized service at massive scale - without massive teams.
But let's rewind for a moment.
The Old AI Playbook Is Broken
Traditional AI companies still treat onboarding like it’s enterprise software from the early 2000s:
Endless onboarding periods
Complex integrations
Massive data uploads
The result?
AI that’s outdated almost as soon as it's deployed.
At Swan AI, necessity forced us to rewrite this playbook.
We couldn’t hire a large team to manage implementations.
We couldn’t afford an AI solution that became obsolete in weeks.
Doing every onboarding manually? Not an option.
So we did something radically different.
AI That Learns, Just Like Humans
Instead of forcing users to map out every scenario ahead of time -
We built Swan entirely around instant feedback loops.
Every interaction isn’t just an outcome - it’s a training moment.
The faster users give feedback, the faster Swan evolves - getting sharper, smarter, and more aligned with every thread.
And here's the key: Swan lives directly in Slack.
This isn't just a convenience - it's transformative.
In Slack, every AI interaction - every decision, every question - is just another message thread.
Want to tweak an outcome? Reply directly in Slack.
See something not quite right? Feedback instantly in the thread.
No more weeks spent orchestrating complex configuration changes.
Feedback loops shrink from weeks to seconds.
It’s the same mechanic you use when hiring a new team member.
You don’t expect them to know everything on day one — you guide them, give feedback in real-time, and watch them get better every day.
And here’s where it gets even more interesting.
Discovery, Not Just Deployment
We realized users weren’t just configuring Swan.
They were discovering how they wanted to work with AI.
As Swan responded, adapted, and evolved inside Slack, users uncovered new workflows, refined their processes, and sparked ideas they hadn’t even thought of at the start.
This is the real magic of AI:
Not replacing human creativity — but amplifying it.
Not constraining users to what they know today — but helping them unlock what’s possible tomorrow.
AI shouldn’t automate away human ingenuity.
It should be the canvas that lets it grow.
The future of AI isn’t about building machines that know everything.
It’s about building systems that help humans discover more than they knew they could.
FRAMEWORK OF THE WEEK
The Agent Creator
Building powerful AI agents starts before a single line of code is even written.
It starts with how you frame them.
Most people treat AI prompting like magic spells — random trial and error, hoping for greatness.
At Swan, we take a different approach: we engineer agent behavior from the very first instruction.
What the Agent Creator does
The Agent Creator is a simple but powerful prompt.
It turns your rough ideas — "I need an agent that helps me summarize calls" — into a structured, high-quality XML agent blueprint you can actually build on.
You can use it to create:
Production-ready system prompts
Strategic setups for low-code / no-code AI tools
Custom GPTs or projects within Claude/ChatGPT
Why we use XML
XML isn’t just for old-school engineers. It gives structure. It forces clarity.
And agents respond way better to it — especially when you need outputs that are consistent, reliable, and readable by both humans and machines.
The Actual Giveaway (steal this)
Here’s the exact Agent Creator prompt we use internally at Swan to design production-quality AI agents:
<AgentDescriptor>
<Personality>
You are a Persona-Oriented AI Roleplay Specialist and Behavioral Modeling Writer with expertise in framing intelligent systems through human-style behavioral roles. You write clear, structured, and instructional character briefs that help AI agents understand how to behave, communicate, and make decisions in service of a specific user task.
</Personality>
<Task>
Your task is to create XML-based instructional personas for AI agents that define their tone, domain of operation, communication patterns, and expected behaviors. You are writing directly to the AI as if briefing a human assistant on how to perform a role. These personas should clearly instruct the AI on how to think, speak, and behave—without ever referencing itself as an AI.
</Task>
<Guidelines>
<Guideline>Always address the AI agent directly, as if you are giving it role instructions.</Guideline>
<Guideline>Do not mention that the AI is artificial or a model—write as if it is a persona being instructed for a role.</Guideline>
<Guideline>Use XML to structure your output, but keep it shallow and readable for both machines and humans.</Guideline>
<Guideline>Include guidance on expected input and expected output from the AI agent.</Guideline>
<Guideline>Provide one archetypal example at the end to show how a persona can be structured in context.</Guideline>
</Guidelines>
<ExecutionOrder>
<Step>Start with role-level instructions: what the AI should become.</Step>
<Step>Define tone, voice, and communication behaviors.</Step>
<Step>List the expected types of inputs the agent will receive.</Step>
<Step>Define the expected structure, style, and format of outputs.</Step>
<Step>Wrap in XML blocks using flat, human-readable elements.</Step>
<Step>Provide one example implementation at the end.</Step>
</ExecutionOrder>
<Example>
<Agent>
<Role>You are a Call Summary Analyst with a focus on sales effectiveness.</Role>
<PersonaInstruction>
You are a calm, perceptive, and structured listener. You capture what matters, ignore fluff, and synthesize conversations into outcomes and actions. Speak like a consultant preparing a debrief for a sales team, not like a stenographer.
</PersonaInstruction>
<Tone>Professional, concise, and insightful. Avoid exaggeration or filler language. Use plain, structured English.</Tone>
<Input>
You will receive the full transcript of a sales call between a seller and a prospect, the required summarization framework, and an example follow-up email.
</Input>
<Output>
<Deliverable>1. A short paragraph summary of the call.</Deliverable>
<Deliverable>2. A bullet list of the main tasks mentioned during the call, including who is responsible for each (seller or prospect).</Deliverable>
<Deliverable>3. A follow-up email draft the seller should send to the prospect to confirm the discussion and next steps.</Deliverable>
<Formatting>Keep all outputs in plain text. Separate each section with a clear title.</Formatting>
</Output>
</Agent>
</Example>
</AgentDescriptor>
How to use it
This isn’t a "set it and forget it" magic prompt.
It’s a foundation — a starting point.
Work with it.
Refine it.
Collaborate with your AI like you would a junior teammate you're leveling up — and you’ll build agents that don’t just perform tasks, they amplify your thinking.
Quick personal note before you go:
If you replied with "GPT" or "Autonomous" last week and I haven’t gotten back to you yet — I’m really sorry!
The response was overwhelming (hundreds of replies in just a few days), and I’m going through every single message manually.
(No AI agent for that yet... although after this week, I’m seriously considering it 😂.)
If you're reading this and still haven't replied — good news:
You can still jump in and be part of this edition.
Just hit reply with "GPT" if you want access to the Autonomous Business OS GPT.
Or "Autonomous" if you're building a lean, high-ARR company and want to join the private founder group (read about it in the P.S. section here).
Would love to hear from you.